IPSec vs. SSL VPNs for Secure Remote Access - Network Security White Papers: Web Server Security, Compliance, and more!
Search the Library
 
 
Home> Security

IPSec vs. SSL VPNs for Secure Remote Access

By : Aventail Aventail

INFORMATION

   
  Published : Jun 21, 2006 
  Length : 10 
  Type : White Paper 
   
 
Download Now
Save for Later
Email this page
  Overview :
 

Internet Protocol Security virtual private networks (IPSec VPNs) were once the only options for secure remote access, but worked only site-to-site and were difficult and costly to maintain. Today, Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) VPNs are increasingly replacing IPSec VPNs because they are less costly to manage, eliminate security risks of open-by-default tunnels, and provide users with simpler, easier-to-use access to the resources they need, whenever they need it.

With an Aventail Smart SSL VPN, for example, users can access any application, even complex ones such as those using voice over Internet protocol (VoIP), from an airport kiosk, a PDA, or a home PC, essentially from anywhere they have an Internet connection. SSL VPNs provide other benefits as well, including reduced total cost of ownership, granular access control, improved security, and cross-platform end-point control.

To learn more about why Aventail SSL VPNs can now replace IPSec solutions, read the white paper, IPSec vs. SSL VPNs for Secure Remote Access.

View All Items By This Company           
Browse Related Categories :
IPSec , SSL , Security , VPN
Search the Library
This Weeks Most Popular Reports   |   Most Popular Topics   |   Vendor Directory
Windows Security Research                                                                                                          
Learn about lead generation opportunities and list your white papers

Community Area

Log in | Register